本帖最後由 Ultraman 於 2009-3-18 16:52 編輯
That's why by reading the word, we can get into the root of the meaning of the word. That's also part of the culture. The simplified word just "kill" the culture in most cases.
Take the "noodle" word in your example, noodle comes from flour, which is also made from wheat. It makes perfect sense.
fibbi 發表於 2009-3-18 15:10 
I meant, for English, people can't "guess" the meaning just by looking at the spelling of the words. According to Chinese culture, yep, we can guess/know the meaning of some of the words just by looking at them, yet, that is not a must, and not a proper way to learn/use a language.
I just quoted "麵" as further discussion, which stated by someone else but not me earlier, if someone think "麵" must be made by some kind of flour or wheat, that might be not too objective, because besides the ingredient, the word "麵" also stand for the "form" (shape) of this particular food.
Many Chinese words don't "appear" as the real meaning as they do. We have to learn their actual meanings anyways, I won't bother to "guess" their meanings just by looking at them (which might not be accurate).
I don't hate simplified Chinese, but I agree it might be inconvenience for HKese (and Taiwanees) cuz it's not popularly learnt. However, people can treat learning it as another knowledge, which could be valuable in our daily lives.
Think about, maybe more and more Western people can speak Mandarin and write simplified Chinese better than we "Chinese". lol |