返回列表 發帖
原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-20 23:17 發表
唉,本來我都唔想教精你架啦...

試想一下有車同無車既分別。你無車既話咪聽行路囉。但如果你有車既話,那怕佢只係架爛鬼前七,總之佢行得走得,你咪一樣可以來回 Vancouver 同 Richmond?

依家試想一下,如果第一日有直昇機 ...



當然可以做到野啦
不過o甘多餘震呀﹐山逆傾瀉o甘﹐班解放軍呀﹐救護員呀﹐通通都好有可能被活埋o羅

TOP

well, 係人都知災情有幾咁嚴重啦... 駛鬼派直昇機去打探woh. 而家d 人造衛星, 好似話連地面上既人睇緊既報紙都好清楚.
分水比災民, 分得比邊個? 唔夠分點算? 分分鐘比人搶哂d 野, 仲有機會你因為救呢個唔救果個而暴動都有份...

生死命懸一線, 小弟深信大陸一定有災難應變小組, 佢地既知識一定比我地高, 小弟選擇相信佢地既專業.

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
法律面前,窮人含撚

TOP

點解你唔去相信災難應變小組既決定呢?
佢地有既資料一定比你多, 佢地有既人都一定比你多. 點解你要不斷覺得佢地做錯野呢?
人地都有腦架, 唔係剩係得你有腦.

TOP

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-20 23:39 發表

阿 Chunsh,我淨係要你呢句就夠了。

要救人就一定有風險架喇,餘震無乜得點預防/預測(係咪怕餘震就完全唔救人?),而山泥傾瀉就多少都有得睇既。不過呢兩樣野都同用唔用直昇機無直接既關係,所以依家唔講啦。

-力 ...


sigh...nothing to say
I would rather save my time

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
法律面前,窮人含撚

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
法律面前,窮人含撚

TOP

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-20 23:17 發表
唉,本來我都唔想教精你架啦...

試想一下有車同無車既分別。你無車既話咪聽行路囉。但如果你有車既話,那怕佢只係架爛鬼前七,總之佢行得走得,你咪一樣可以來回 Vancouver 同 Richmond?

依家試想一下,如果第一日有直昇機 ...

How many victims were buried alive feet and km underneath that can't be reached within minutes or even hours?! Pour gallons of water on the ground and sand and let it drip into people's mouths feet/km underneath? Your imagination really amazes us! And how many victims you think a well trained rescuer can save? Would a rescuer sacrifice himself/herself just to save one life? Obviously, you are not an expert and not even close to normal common sense.

TOP

唔係如果就係if, 我地好累啊!

TOP

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-21 00:03 發表

I do not doubt that they know much more than I do, but the fact remains that they are humans just like everyone of us, and China has not faced an earthquake disaster of this magnitude since the Tong  ...

I see. Sounds like you are not only a regular expert but super genius! Why are you still sitting in front of the computer giving out your constructive ideas in a blow water forum but not had flown to there days ago already saving millions lives there?

TOP

返回列表