peter236

麥生，導火線係gmail俾人hack呀......睇多D新聞啦....
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-3-25 02:22

These so called experts in the US still could not prove who hacked the gmail. They claimed it was the government. Then they found some evidence it was some students in university/college.
But then there is no way you can know if it was a conspiracy of the US government and google, unless they showed all the evidence.

peter236

google係日本都贏唔到yahoo,又唔見人地撤出日本?
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-3-25 02:27

A world dominated by US search engines is not acceptable as the security of other countries will be affected.
Yahoo will probably either will go bankrupt or be swallowed up by Microsoft or others.

rockypath

These so called experts in the US still could not prove who hacked the gmail. They claimed it was t ...
peter236 發表於 2010-3-25 18:22

Whether US has proof or not does not mean a thing at all. Intelligent agency of most countries in the world has its tactic force continuingly develop the technologies and abilities to launch sophisticated cyber attaches on the national communication networks, military commanding or coordinating systems. More importantly, every country is hacking other countries in its interest.

Even the networks in universities have to withstand hundreds of attempts of cyber attach each day. Ask your networks administrator in your college or university to verify what I said.

I just laugh at it when Google claimed it is the reason it pull out of China.

rockypath

呢個只係藉口而已...
比人hack? 所有web mail 既system 都會比人hack, 唔只Google一個. 比人hack, 就應該 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-3-25 06:28

This is an example showing how people can be easily misled by “news report”. Even thought the news does not suggest one way or another, people will have their own “intelligent” reasoning to come to the conclusion of what the “truth” is.

peter236

Whether US has proof or not does not mean a thing at all. Intelligent agency of most countries in  ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-3-26 13:34

We all know the reason was that they could not compete with Baidu and they are not used to being number 2 in a market. Either that or it was because of a conspiracy involving the US government.

Lik

睇住阿石仔同Peter仔兩個響度唱雙簧真係笑爆嘴～

-力

rockypath

睇住阿石仔同Peter仔兩個響度唱雙簧真係笑爆嘴～

-力
Lik 發表於 2010-3-26 16:25

Other than the BS like this, what else can you say to me?

I don't think you have the ability and knowledge to make a solid argument against me.

rockypath

We all know the reason was that they could not compete with Baidu and they are not used to being nu ...
peter236 發表於 2010-3-26 16:17

Honestly speaking, I am not sure about this. I still don't understand the reason why since it is a very unusual move to me and I don't believe in the reasons that were reported.

In fact, I am watching its performance on the stock market and waiting for any news about Google coming out soon and as well any actions the US government might take against China since it has been heavily putting more pressure on China regarding exchange rate, government subsidizing and trade deficit lately.

tofu

"""When China becomes democratic some day, then Google may go back to China. But do you think they will ever regain their market share, LOL?"""

why not?  most foreign banks left china years ago, and not they go back, they still gain a big market.  unless baidu can go internationally in the next few years.  or china will take long long time to become democratic.

peter236

"""When China becomes democratic some day, then Google may go back to China. But do you think they w ...
tofu 發表於 2010-3-26 21:35

Baidu is more successful than google because they offer a much better product for the Chinese. The same with ebay, amazon or yahoo which were beaten by Chinese competitors that offer better localized products.

Are you kidding? Which foreign bank has large market share in China? There is no foreign banks that are dominant in China now. Even HSBC has very small market share in China. Banks are different than other internet companies. Even in Canada and the US, if some foreigners want to become a majority owner of a bank, they need to get approval from the government. It is unlikely that any foreign bank will become dominant in China or the US.