返回列表 發帖
I actually never try that myself, but I know another guy use this method.  Maybe he is not shooti ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-5-13 10:12

oh, then what did u use on the picture u showed on the first page?

TOP

On your 70-200? then no worry about Vignetting.
Catpiano 發表於 2011-5-13 21:18


on my 17-40 +_+

TOP

Every filter has its own effect, decide what result you want to achieve and use the filter accordingly.

TOP

本帖最後由 Look4chrisng 於 2011-5-14 00:59 編輯
oh, then what did u use on the picture u showed on the first page?
嘉嘉 發表於 2011-5-13 21:27



    oh,  no filter.  I am talking slow shutter speed.  I was at f22 ISO 160 INDOOR.  For a 1sec exposure outdoor.  you will need a filter.

TOP

On your 70-200? then no worry about Vignetting.
Catpiano 發表於 2011-5-13 21:18



Vignetting is making a come back.  Lots of kids are shooting LOMO cameras, shoot first and think later. and they make very fun pictures.

TOP

yes, I know
if i thought they were the same, I wouldn't be struggling to choose which one to get + ...
嘉嘉 發表於 2011-5-13 21:10


if you know what they are, why do you still need to struggle? Just get the one you need.

TOP

Also, 17-40 is not happy with 50D.   50D likes 17-55 kind of guy.

TOP

本帖最後由 Catpiano 於 2011-5-14 09:39 編輯
on my 17-40 +_+
嘉嘉 發表於 2011-5-13 22:50


Then no worry ..  no vignetting too.

TOP

oh,  no filter.  I am talking slow shutter speed.  I was at f22 ISO 160 INDOOR.  For a 1sec e ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-5-14 00:58

oh~~~icic, yeah indoor at f22 is good enough for slow shutter speed
for outdoor it could still be too bright

TOP

if you know what they are, why do you still need to struggle? Just get the one you need.
siumaibb 發表於 2011-5-14 01:05


cuz I was thinking if I could use a CPL as a ND.....
want to "one lift two get" and save money ar ma.....(yes I know it sounds kinda ridiculous +_+)

but I think I am more leaning toward a ND now
is broadway camera a good place to get one?

TOP

返回列表