Look4chrisng

"its ok, history and news always show that who know the real fact about world: who got $$ (or resource), who got bargaining power. In hk, water, food, $$ are mainly from mainland china "

Well Spoken.

Lik

話又說回來﹐在港英其間,香港人真的有絕對的自由?
chunsh 發表於 2011-8-29 09:40

無人話港英時代港人有絕對嘅自由，但人地事頭婆班手下有料，可以將香港打理得井井有條，民怨少、民憤極低，咁就自然少人嘈。而且就算有民間有衝擊（eg.67年暴動）、政策或者管治班子有錯誤（eg.警隊貪污問題），人地港英政府都一定會從中吸取教訓，然後糾正錯誤，而唔係好似你特衰政府咁死不認錯、死不悔改，連遮羞布都唔用來明目張膽咁去舔阿爺屎眼，而且仲要次次爆鑊都鑊鑊新鮮鑊鑊甘。

人地港英政府當年嘅管治手腕真係不知高過你阿爺班垃圾幾多N倍。

當你管治好似特衰政府咁如此無能嘅時候，而民怨、民憤又積累到一個程度嘅時候，大事就一定會令到個社會爆屎渠。而如果你民間積怨積累到好似今日中國大陸咁深嘅時候，任何大小事情都會一觸及就爆發成為大規模事件（所以依家大陸差唔多日日都有爆發大小騷動／暴動）。而再嚴重啲，就會變成好似中東／地中海一帶嘅政府咁倒台、民變。

-力

peter236

無人話港英時代港人有絕對嘅自由，但人地事頭婆班手下有料，可以將香港打理得井井有條，民怨少、民憤極低 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-29 10:33

This is nonsense. Before 1997 was a different era, as Hong Kong's economy was just taking off, and the pro-British HK people like you dare not oppose the British imperial masters. Now Hong Kong economy has already matured.

The messy London 2011 riots show the British cannot handle the protests and complaints in the society. The 民怨 and、民憤 are very high in Britain, showing their lousy management skills.

chunsh

無人話港英時代港人有絕對嘅自由，但人地事頭婆班手下有料，可以將香港打理得井井有條，民怨少、民憤極低 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-29 10:33

   

人地事頭婆班手下有料，可以將香港打理得井井有條

都要無甘多刁民﹐多番的順民合作先得架

仲有世界經濟呢﹐本土就業呢?
以前香港有自己既生產業﹐出口﹐轉口工業﹐百業興旺
而家? 整個社會得番服務業﹐金融﹐樓市帶動﹐塘水滾塘魚。外圍經濟有的風吹草
動﹐可以令到整個社會不安

blue20ae

回復 23# peter236


To be fair 港英政府 <> 英國政府, just like 香港特區政府 <> 中國中央.

lo_pak

回復 13# chunsh

First and for all, I think in your response you have overwhelming a whole bunch of idea without delivering them properly. In order to make things clear...

1) how can you justify these protesting university students (in this case, not other cases) as "糞青"? They could be "憤青" instead...

2) What's your defintion of "糞青"?

3) what have these university students done wrong?

4) Under what cirsumstances you think a protest should be like at the university?

To me, I disagree violence. If someone has broke the law s/he should be punished. But, at the same time, I believe that basic human right cannot be threatened. That's why the quality of law enforcement is so important.

To my disappointment, after the HK council public hearing, evidents show that someone must be lying.

chunsh

回復  chunsh

First and for all, I think in your response you have overwhelming a whole bunch of id ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-8-29 15:37


To my disappointment, after the HK council public hearing, evidents show that someone must be lying.

come on, dont be a child
lying is everywhere in human society, and politics is a place where lying is required (or must happen very frequent)

lo_pak

回復 27# chunsh

If you are talking about "公道" at the beginning of the post and now you are accepting lying of the affairs, don't you find any contradiction? Are you some kind of mess up or your main intention is to fool people around...

chunsh

回復  chunsh

If you are talking about "公道" at the beginning of the post and now you are acceptin ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-8-29 17:37

公道同"政治充滿謊話"有什麼衝突?
先前我說你應該公道一點因為好多人都只是批評警察對示威者的做法不好﹐但卻沒
有太多人說過那些糞青在很多的集會上怎樣對警察諸多挑釁﹐有時候甚至insult。
我相信沒有任何一個國家容許警察被insult﹐他們警告你不要動﹐你一反抗﹐他們
就已經有足夠理據去用武力把你抬走/按在地上。香港警察卻沒有那麼兇暴。你說他
們為鷹犬辦事。但他們是紀律部隊, 服從上級指示係應份(你想象一下如果個個警察
都好像長毛個班癲狗那樣﹐香港整個社會會變成怎樣)﹐ 他們不是去殺人放火。

政治充滿謊言是事實﹐我說accept是accept這是一個事實﹐認同不認同說謊是令外一件事。

這兩件事根本"風馬牛不相及"﹐何來conflict? 閣下的理解能力真的令人難以理解

chunsh

事件跟本就係一個羅生門﹐何解一班癲狗/糞青逢警別反?
甘能唔託的差佬第日俾人打劫/俾D MK 打到HiHi個陣咪能報警

試下睇其他角度既報導
http://www.eastweek.com.hk/index.php?aid=14779

http://www.eastweek.com.hk/index.php?aid=14780