Ovaltine

回復 21# fy789


  Why are you assuming we are criticizing PRC's corruption problems? It's the government official's lack of competence in creating an efficient Railway system. If you are not capable, be like Translink and get New Flyers or Bombardier to do it!  Translink did have problems with it's buses, but not to the point where it involves the safety of the civilians. Government official lack ethics and responsibly. They have a total disregard of people's lives. When the government doesn't care about the people, the people will imitate them as examples. This is why Chinese lack morals.

Lik

條仆街唔借機轉移視線去貪污問題，然後再拖埋其他國家落水來搏做 damage control嘅話，仲可以點樣幫阿爺兜？呢啲賤種係咁撚樣㗎啦？

-力

peter236

回復  fy789


  Why are you assuming we are criticizing PRC's corruption problems? It's the governm ...
Ovaltine 發表於 2011-9-27 22:27

What has that to do with the Chinese government? It is the company that makes the signal system.

peter236

time to buy bombardier, good luck trying to export these trains to rest of the world
Ovaltine 發表於 2011-9-27 12:34

You moron, the Shanghai subway trains are already made by Bombardier, or Alstom. Are you saying Bombardier trains are crap?
wow, you are just ignorant and the stupidest moron around here.

Please please please, research and learn before spewing crap here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Metro

mcjohnjohn

US has NO advanced fully-digital signal system technology as US has no high-speed railway
fy789 發表於 2011-9-28 14:19

原來美國冇d 咁既野架? 唔怪得今次搞成咁啦... 因為冇得copy cat. 之前大陸最like 派d 工程師去美國吸收人地d 科技, 呢點的確做得唔錯的.

mcjohnjohn

If you are not blind, go to look at Satil/MonicaMok's reply post #20 !
fy789 發表於 2011-9-28 14:40

呢次你arm. 不過如果唔加"If you are not blind", 而係用please 就會感覺有禮貌d.