快樂牛郎

好中意呢2張

ricrick

如果可以令到更多人大腦造成刺激，甘張相隻鬼米大隻D law

我想講係，點多好，總之，要有「靈魂」啦，靈魂~~~~ 你明既

快樂牛郎

原帖由 MoiRhapsody 於 2009/2/25 00:41 發表
有一個已故既攝影帥講過,
沒有人的照片,不好看.

所以如果你想迎合呢個攝影師既類型
你就要影人

至於我自己
對人冇咩特別感情/感覺
所以我亦唔會特別去做呢樣野

ricrick

靈魂可以好看，又可以不好看，總之，要有「靈魂」啦

MoiRhapsody

好難講,唔想用太科學分析呢回事,
剌激,共嗚,點都好,去拍自己心目中既晝面就好.

ricrick

其實攝影係張攝影師的point of view show 比人睇，比人睇佢睇到乜野
如果你睇同大家睇既一樣，我會話係無靈魂
eg. product 相，硬照..etc..(但不是一定)

快樂牛郎

原帖由 ricrick 於 2009/2/25 02:26 發表
其實攝影係張攝影師的point of view show 比人睇，比人睇佢睇到乜野
如果你睇同大家睇既一樣，我會話係無靈魂
eg. product 相，硬照..etc..(但不是一定)

But in almost every case there are viewers who see things that the photographer didn't see. So your theory doesn't quite apply.

MSN04

I read 數碼雙周.

ricrick

原帖由 快樂牛郎 於 2009-2-25 10:02 發表


But in almost every case there are viewers who see things that the photographer didn't see. So your theory doesn't quite apply.

靈魂無話睇到吾睇到，時運高就睇到時運低睇吾到
same for viewers or photographers' perspectives

ricrick

原帖由 快樂牛郎 於 2009-2-25 01:41 發表
?v=0
?v=0

好中意呢2張

你覺得條d乜？