返回列表 發帖
if u wanted to post something good about china in the computer industry, you should post dr. an wang ...
habitrailspace 發表於 2010-6-2 08:46


Don't get what you want to say here.

However, I happen to know a Hong Kong lady worked under Dr. An Wang and her husband (I don't know him in person) was a VP in An Wang's company as well. The husband later worked for IBM and the lady worked for Cisco's competitor.

TOP

Don't get what you want to say here.

However, I happen to know a Hong Kong lady worked under Dr.  ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-2 08:57


he was the one who invented magnetic core memory

TOP

本帖最後由 MoiRhapsody 於 2010-6-2 11:41 編輯
fibbi, 小弟極度贊同你既諗法.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-6-1 18:16



當北京十萬上訪人民有冤無路訴,胡溫訪災爛秀與他們何干?
當上海強遷戶引訴無門無處容身,世博千年盛典與他們何干?
當西北學童上課無筆無紙無教室,國研電腦封亞與他們何干?

TOP

No pen/ No Paper is not a problem, since computer is supposed to bring in paperless enviroment.  Why need pen, when you can type on a keyboard, and why need paper, when you can click file-save..!  Wait... maybe they don't have any electricity to start with =(

當上海強遷戶引訴無門無處容身,世博盛典與他們何干?
當西北學童上課無筆無紙無教室,電腦封亞與他們何 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-2 11:30

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-6-2 11:53 編輯
當北京十萬上訪人民有冤無路訴,胡溫訪災爛秀與他們何干?
當上海強遷戶引訴無門無處容身,世博千年盛典 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-2 11:30


The supercomputers can in fact make money and thereby improve the living standards of the ordinary people.
Like I said before, research results and applications from supercomputing e.g petroleum exploration, aerospace, finance, software, biotechnology, and other research at universities etc are generating income for the country as a whole, thereby raising per capita income. The return of investments are in terms of billions of dollars. That is why so many countries are using supercomputers.

Those residents on the Shanghai Expo site were given new apartments by the government. Some of the old apartments did not have modern wash room or proper heating anyway. So it is a big upgrade for the residents there.

TOP

就算啲$唔攪奧運世博,都唔一定落到百姓個袋,根本就係貪腐嚴重,無法紀就乜都假。
我唔會覺得攪啲大型活動係一啲得着都無囉。至少,啲市民會被迫"知會"要排隊, 守禮,而且啲市容都好咗啲嘅。又多咗啲公共設施,都唔係壞事。當然,你會話花咁多錢值唔值,咁就見人見智。

咁換個topic,你哋覺得我哋攪冬奧有應唔應該?我哋都有好多貧窮問題喎。啲$係唔係用嚟濟貧好啲?
不過,我又覺得大家喺冬奧其間都好投入喎,直情好似與民同樂咁,咁大家又覺得有無得着?

TOP

A lot of the lavish exhibits in Shanghai will be torn down after the Expo event. How much did it cost to build those? And how long have they been in use for? And with all the construction and demolition, have you considered the amount of environmental impact and inconvenience that the city will have to endure?

The Winter Olympics is a waste of money as well, although in terms of infrastructure, we are doing a much better job than the Shanghai Expo and the Beijing Olympics. Much of the Winter Olympic events were held at existing venues, some of which underwent significant renovations. The Richmond Oval was new, and the track is getting torn down after the games, but at least the entire structure will be preserved and converted to a multi-use sports complex where common citizens can continue to take advantage of the facilities on a daily basis.

By comparison, the Watercube is being converted into a waterpark, while the Bird's Nest is being gutted and turned into a shopping mall and high class hotel.

Last but not least, the Canadian per capatia income is almost US$40k, while China's is around US$3500. I'll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions about which country is in a better position to host major international events.

And may I remind you that in recent memory, China has already held the Beijing Olympics in 2008, the World Expo in Shanghai right now, and Guangzhou will be holding the Asian Games (亞運會) in November. How many international events of similar scale has Canada recently held?

-Lik

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-6-2 15:26 編輯
A lot of the lavish exhibits in Shanghai will be torn down after the Expo event. How much did it cos ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-2 13:41


Lik, you stupid moron, each country is responsible for paying their own pavilion at the Shanghai Expo. You didn't know about that?
China only pays for China pavalion, which has a solar panel rooftop for generating power for thousands of families.

Canada is just a small country, with big deficits and loads of debt.
They take HST from you.

In terms of investment in infrastructure at the Beijing Olympics and the Shanghai Expo, most of the investments are actually in basic infrastructure that they need anyway, like new subway, highway, expansion of airports, water supply system, solar power etc.
Beijing airport is now the third busiest airport in the world.

Many of the Beijing Olympics venues became parts of the universities there and used by students or by the general public, or became training centers for their various national teams.

TOP

本帖最後由 fibbi 於 2010-6-2 15:08 編輯

沒錯,博覽會的設施在完結之後大多會拆卸。對本地人來說construction/demolition的確會帶來不便。其實我自己都去過幾個博覽會,85 年日本筑波,86年Vancouver,2005日本Aichi縣。博覽會就是我當年決定到當地旅遊的原因。所以至少博覽會都會帶動當地旅遊業。而舉辦得成功的博覽會,的確會為該城市留下正面印象。我相信父母當年看到Vancouver這樣山明水秀,都成為日後選擇移民時要考慮的地方。

至於奧運,更多場館可留於市民享用,所以你問我,我仍然覺得舉辦大型活動得多於失。

至於山區窮困問題,根本不在於政府無$,而是怎樣分配資源,而分配的資源又有多少落到實際用途而不是官員的口袋。

TOP

回復 38# peter236


    Well, there are a lot of infrastructure needs to be built too. So China govt not only pay for its own pavillion but other infrastructure as well la.

TOP

返回列表