返回列表 發帖
Also, 17-40 is not happy with 50D.   50D likes 17-55 kind of guy.
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-5-14 01:11


why is it not happy with 50D?

TOP

Vignetting is making a come back.  Lots of kids are shooting LOMO cameras, shoot first and think  ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-5-14 01:05

I actually tried to photoshop in vignet last time into one of my pictures.....lol
but guess it didn't work too well

TOP

ADDING Vignette and vignette from lens/filter is two thing ..

Should say Vignette and "DARK corner" is not the same. Some nice old german glasses have vignette, but not dark corner. (lost of light vs dark shadow)

There is nothing wrong with 17-40 on 50D, actually, it is still slightly nicer then the 17-55 (Bokeh/Colour/Sharpness) however, 17-55 is faster (F2.8 vs F4) better/longer range, and very effective IS, 17-55IS is reasonable close to "L" lens construction, but I guess Canon don't want to call a crop lens "L" (luxury)

I actually use my 18-55/15-85/18-135 etc more then 17-55 or 17-40 on crop bodies .. I guess just habbit.

Back to ND, 77mm filters are not cheap, so I understand you may not want to buy many of them, and nend up not using them much.

There is a kind of ND filter you can adjust the level, I don't have one, but worth to try, and won't add extra thickness as well. (I am old school, use 2x/4x/8x)

^_^

TOP

cuz I was thinking if I could use a CPL as a ND.....
want to "one lift two get" and save money ar  ...
嘉嘉 發表於 2011-5-15 12:59


Just curious, what kind photos are you trying to take with the ND filter?

TOP

why is it not happy with 50D?
嘉嘉 發表於 2011-5-15 13:00


Because it is hard to get cozy up indoor.  You will be shooting at very high ISO sometime.  

Why pay for the large image circle when you can't use them?

TOP

Just curious, what kind photos are you trying to take with the ND filter?
siumaibb 發表於 2011-5-16 08:25


people moving ar
water ar
flower, tree, grass being blown by breeze ar
and when too bright outside I think the filter would come in handy too?

TOP

Because it is hard to get cozy up indoor.  You will be shooting at very high ISO sometime.  

Why  ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-5-16 09:30


u mean f2.8 vs f4?

TOP

回復 37# 嘉嘉

有IS 加埋有多15mm用
不過比我都係選1740

TOP

本帖最後由 嘉嘉 於 2011-5-16 12:10 編輯
回復  嘉嘉

有IS 加埋有多15mm用
不過比我都係選1740
Mr.JPG 發表於 2011-5-16 10:04

IS對我o黎講唔太重要....自問對石糕手都唔係差~~XD

但你又點解都係揀 1740?
我頭先真係有少少比looing4chris搞到對支1755心動

TOP

回復 38# Mr.JPG

It very well depends on how you use the lens.
For outdoor shot I will say both 17-40 and 17-55 are roughly the same.
But for indoor shot, the IS and f2.8 on 17-55 certainly boost the performance (17mm @ 1/20sec, handheld @ dim condition, no problemo... the photo is sharp, bright and clean)
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

返回列表