返回列表 發帖
回復  Mr.JPG

It very well depends on how you use the lens.
For outdoor shot I will say both 17-40  ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-5-16 12:14


tempting tempting........>___<

TOP

回復 39# 嘉嘉

As compared with the 17-55, I feel a bit disappointed with the 16-35II (at low light) that I'm using...
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

回復 41# 嘉嘉

If you think you will be staying with crops for a while, stick with the 17-55, I promise you will not regret...
Last year when I decided to sell my 17-55 (upgraded to APSC-H), do you know what's my feeling?
I feel like I'm selling my boy away...
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

oh wait...........17-55 is an ef-s lens.....

oh, but 16-35 also got f2.8 bor?

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-5-16 12:37 編輯

回復 44# 嘉嘉

No conflict between EF and EF-S if you are using on crops.
EF-S doesn't work on full frame though, and that's probably the main reason why people doesn't choose 17-55.
The IS on the 17-55 helps quite a bit in low light environment.
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

回復 42# lo_pak

撇開個價錢唔講
我覺得個1635幾好啊。起碼個星茫幾掂
最憎個 82mm filter size. 搞到冇得用返之前個 77mm CPL filter
早排都係用左隻 T116 再加錢 係 CL 喥整左隻返黎 。

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-5-16 13:25 編輯

回復 46# Mr.JPG

most things will be nice if 撇開個價錢唔講...

BTW, like what you've mentioned, the 82mm filter size is SO annoying...

TOP

回復  嘉嘉

No conflict between EF and EF-S if you are using on crops.
EF-S doesn't work on full fr ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-5-16 12:30


hehe, but full frame body is my next target

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-5-16 13:36 編輯

回復 48# 嘉嘉

When do you think you are going to own a 5D or 5DII?
One thing I don't like Canon full frame body mostly because it has a poor focusing system (compare to the price).
Make sure you know what you are shooting.
For landscape, portriat or non-moving objects, full frame is terrific.
However, for sports or concerts, IMO, it's quite crappy.
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

I still don't know yet

hopefully within a year?
plus I don't want to buy it now then canon announces 5DIII all of a sudden LOL

TOP

返回列表