Catpiano

原帖由 MSN04 於 2009-1-5 02:58 發表


Only the fat/short/ugly ones with tons of imaginary cars do

Ha ? HYPE is FAT, UGLY and SHORT mei??   I can't imagine that ..

MSN04

原帖由 Catpiano 於 2009-1-5 13:20 發表



Ha ? HYPE is FAT, UGLY and SHORT mei??   I can't imagine that ..

Hey... u said that.  I didn't lol

news

looks like im rich according to the stats..ahhaha..but i don't feel like im rich tho

fibbi

Hm...actually do I care about the stats? Probably not. Even though (IF) I'm the top 10%, if I can't afford an LV bag (just an example of luxury item), I don't consider myself to be rich.

Of course, rich in the heart is more important. This topic is just to say how would you define rich in terms of salary...

I would say having $10K/month income (net, after tax), that's pretty "rich"...

大C姐

有錢人係唔會每個月逗人工﹐通常係一次過上落。

我就覺得有錢人就一定唔會係打工仔啦﹐講完。

如果你仲係諗住發達但係又無諗住創業就死左條心啦。打工仔係永遠唔會賺得多過個老細。

所以其實呢個topic係好費囉。你問呢個問題同"definition of OLD","definition of GOOD","definition of HAPPY"又乜分別呢?


-- 有錢女

Littleprince

原帖由 大C姐 於 2009-1-7 21:30 發表
有錢人係唔會每個月逗人工﹐通常係一次過上落。

我就覺得有錢人就一定唔會係打工仔啦﹐講完。

如果你仲係諗住發達但係又無諗住創業就死左條心啦。打工仔係永遠唔會賺得多過個老細。

所以其實呢個topic係好費囉。你問 ...

原則上幾同意呢個有錢女的見解﹐
只係﹐
李生都話自己人工少過自己伙記﹐
呢個世界還是有所謂打工皇帝的嘛
所以﹐FIBBI 的看法我也同意﹐若果在加拿大 NET $10﹐000 一個月﹐
真的算是富有﹐
問題係﹐咩工先有這樣的收入呢﹖
我無意中看過一個牙醫的人工﹐
好像都沒有這麼多呢

PS﹕ TOPIC 費都好過唔開 TOPIC﹐因為樓主有 PAY EFFORT 諗話題都應記一功﹐學似呢度某D人的口頭禪﹕吹水之馬﹐使乜認真﹖FORUM 討論D野係甘費架啦﹐睇開D啦。。。成日講神講佛又惹某D朋友反感的了

[ 本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-1-7 21:43 編輯 ]

大C姐

原帖由 Littleprince 於 2009-1-7 21:40 發表

原則上幾同意呢個有錢女的見解﹐
只係﹐
李生都話自己人工少過自己伙記﹐
呢個世界還是有所謂打工皇帝的嘛
所以﹐FIBBI 的看法我也同意﹐若果在加拿大 NET $10﹐000 一個月﹐
真的算是富有﹐
問題係﹐咩工先有這樣的收入呢﹖
我無 ...

李生邊在乎份"人工"呀﹐咪搞笑啦。

打工王帝極其量係一班薪金偏高﹐工作性質又優閒嘅打工一族。可以好富足﹐但係並非有錢人。

呢個世界如果老闆賺得少過員工﹐仲有人做生意?

我唔係話樓住廢﹐我係話個topic好空範﹐好費神。其實唔係好想諗咩工賺得最多錢﹐因為一定唔係自己做緊果份。


-- 有錢女2

chunsh

rich: can achieve any goal that require any amount of $$ (including medical services)