Read my posts again about how much extra infrastructure and stadiums GVRD has built to accommodate the Winter Games, and think back to how much Beijing and Shanghai has built for the Olympics and World Expo, and what is happening to all those extra stadiums after the event. Guess which city has seen more waste.
Read my posts again about how much extra infrastructure and stadiums GVRD has built to accommodate t ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-2 19:08
Winter Olympics in Vancouver is different from Beijing Olympics and Shanghai Expo. I have already showed you how most of the basic infrastructure in Beijing and Shanghai are not wasted.
In fact, in all three cases, Vancouver, Beijing and Shanghai, I can see that the investment is, in general, justified and not wasted.
Maybe there is less "waste" in Vancouver 2010, but the winter Olympics is so small compared with the summer Olympics and the Expo.
So please stop you nonsense bashing of Beijing and Shanghai.
笑爆嘴～唔該你去問下東莞或廣東省其他工業區問吓啲廠佬邊個無試過 rolling blackout。唔該之後再去埋全國 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-2 15:58
You stupid moron, that is why the return from infrastructure investment in Beijing and Shanghai are bigger than that from Vancouver. Economic growth in China is still way higher than in Canada.
We are talking about 15 million population in Beijing and 20 million population in Shanghai. Most of the Olympics investments are in basic infrastructure, not Olympics stadium. For example, the new subways, highspeed railway and highways in Beijing and Shanghai are not even enough to service their big population. The new airport expansion in Beijing allowed Beijing to become the third busiest airport in the world in 2009. The new water supply system in Beijing provides clean water to the residents.
Many of the Beijing Olympics venues became parts of the local universities there and are used by students or by the general public, or became training centers for their various national sports teams.
Lik, you lost the argument on supercomputers, then you diverted to the Olympics. But now you lost the argument on Olympics and the Expo again.
I will give one example of the application of supercomputers which directly benefits 平民百姓 daily life.
Weather forecast and earthquake prediction is an area where supercomputers are heavily relied on. The complexity of simulation model depends on the power of the supercomputers and that decides the capability of weather forecast and earthquake prediction.
If China had the capability to predict 四川大地震，華中大水災，西南大旱災, how many lives would be saved, how many families would stay intact, how much damage would be minimized? When you say it is a waste of money to build supercomputer, do you know what you are saying?
You should be shameful of what you do NOT know when you laugh at other people who do not have a computer science degree as you do.
If I response to your comments of investing in science and technology research and development is a waste of money and 忽視 the needs of 平民百姓, it will be another big time embarrassment to you.
When you say something, you better think carefully whether you are aware of what you are going to say. Otherwise, it will be another embarrassment to you.
但當你咁多地方都仲係窮到燶嘅時候，我就唔該你唔好搞咁多尖端科技野，做多啲民生嘅實務。要追尖端科技嘅話永遠都係一件無敵燒銀紙嘅事。當個成本效益咁低，而你又有其它更逼切、更加 benefitical 嘅事可以做，咁點解要去做啲燒錢嘅事情？ ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-2 01:32
發表於 2010-6-2 19:08
| 
