peter236

回復  peter236


WS-10/WS-10A (Tai-Hung):

Hybrid of:
US: GE F100
Russia: AL-31FN
fy789 發表於 2011-1-6 20:48

Looks like the new WS-11 engines.

mcjohnjohn

Looks like the new WS-11 engines.
peter236 發表於 2011-1-7 12:56

睇唔出Peter 仔對飛機都咁有研究!

lo_pak

回復 51# peter236

Come on, what's the power output of WS-11...? You tell me...

WS-11 was equipped on light attack aircraft JL-8...

PLEASE don't assume number bigger is better/newer...

The new engine on J-10 is the WS-10 or the J-10B with WS-10A...

lo_pak

回復 52# mcjohnjohn

Me too x 2, he's quite a guy "咁有"研究...

peter236

回復  peter236

Come on, what's the power output of WS-11...? You tell me...

WS-11 was equipped on ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-1-6 21:53

They will probably use the WS-15 instead.

lo_pak

回復 55# peter236

No idea, even though the WS-10 boosts the service life to be >2,500 hrs while the AL31FN can only last for 1,500 hrs, god knows... But still, I believe they are still better than Indian' ones...

Hopefully those Chinese engines won't like those Chinese Can Food which have expiry date last FOREVER...

Back to the J-20 prototype, the more I watch, the more questions I have... Something isn't right of being a "stealth" plane...

1) If it's a bomber it's too small, whereas if it's a fighter it's a bit too big...
2) Why canard...
3) Tail is over exposed...

peter236

回復  peter236

No idea, even though the WS-10 boosts the service life to be >2,500 hrs while the A ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-1-6 22:28

The Indians can't even make their own 3rd generation LCA planes.

lo_pak

回復 59# fy789

If you are building for ONLY one product, it is...

beside $$, you still need time/experiments/testings, which are also important factors...

Good design needs not to be expensive...

Expensive one may not be the best...

Bad example: Remember the Arjun?? The prototype looks good (if you don't mind the cost), it's a nightmare when it goes for testing (Everything just didn't work)...

Good example: AK47...

The key to success: research & practise!