>So how can your democracy change the situations ?
>Please explain.
那坐定定，听我点教育你拉， 扑街仔
民主是一个监督机制，是align 人民利益和执政人利益的关键。 传媒是监督社会时弊的有力武器。 好似毒奶粉事件甘，如果唔系纽西兰政府揭穿你中国的毒奶粉事件，如今中国仍然有三鹿奶粉的毒奶粉。没有民主制度的监督，媒体就不可能起到自由报道监督社会的作用。在中国媒体是政府操纵，系政府欺骗强奸民意的工具
>Haha, really? I don't believe 立法局就是民选的; at most, only part of the members were
>elected and that's only for the very last part of British sovereignty, after Chris Patten
>became the governor of Hong Kong. I left HK in 1988, and we didn't have general
election at that time wor.
按照你的讲法，以前彭定康时代没普选，是否现在香港不应该争取普选？ 你只要答系还是唔系
如果过唔系，香港人争取普选有什么错？ 香港人好似你甘素质低劣？ 还是没吃得够饱唔可以选举啊？
你够胆回答我问题吗？
>In the 70's and 80's, a place called Hong Kong had absolutely NO 民主, but had
>100% 三权分立 wor !!!
你只能讲没完全的民主，不能讲完全没民主。 当时的香港是言论自由的社会，有民主先会有可能言论自由。
>Since you mentioned that democracy is preceding and the basis for 三权分立,
>so why do places like the Philippines, and India have a democratic society but also
>very corrupted, inefficient and injustice governments ? Could you explain here ?
你可以讲菲律宾和印度贪污腐化犀利，都是因为你有机会从媒体中了解很多的资料，中国的情况比印度同菲律宾更严重，只是所有的媒体都被封口。好似你D 在大陆一天都没生活过的人你会知道几多呢？ 你以为中国就只有一个赖昌星？ 甘你就系千错万错
>I NEVER TOLD YOU CHINA IS A 法治社会 wor !!!!!!
>In fact, I said China NEEDS 法治 more than 民主 ah !!
>For people like you who never lived in 法治社会 like Hong Kong for a long time,
>you don't even know what is 法治社会 in Asia ! You only see the 法治社会
>in western countries, and tried to adopt 100% to China
法治社会需要民主机制进行监督， 没有与人民利益一致的民意代表的监督着执政人，执政人就可以控制司法，就好似近期的毒奶粉案，四川豆腐渣工程，法庭无需证据，无需审判，直接判案。民主机制的监督是保证法治社会的首要条件
三权分立就是要互相制行，如果过司法和执法都是由行政主导，而行政系由一班小圈子既得利益者主导，请问三权如何分立？
>That's what I told you, 好好读书 is not enough gar, 做一名医生 most important
>thing is to have the heart to help others. I know too many gold-digging doctors,
>and they are just like you said, only know 好好读书, finished the degree, and
>go to earn big money, but totally disregard the fact that they don't like to work
>as doctors and facing patients everyday.
没人话好好读书就已经足够做一个名医生，你逻辑上唔好搞错，做一名医生必须的先决条件就是要读好书，这个系最低门槛。 你连最基本的逻辑101你都分唔请，写出一大堆废话只能显示你的素质系如何低劣 |
發表於 2011-1-2 12:01
| 
