返回列表 發帖
原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-3-5 21:46 發表
四號, 唔好花時間同Ultraman 糾纏喇, 佢係辯論既能手, 唔做律師既話真係浪費左佢天賦既才華.

Did I tell you I am not a lawyer? But thanks to your compliment anyways.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-3-6 00:56 發表

Did I tell you I am not a lawyer? But thanks to your compliment anyways.


超人平時比人封住個口講唔到野,唯有響LYK狂打!Ultraman文武雙全,勁呀!

TOP

原帖由 katamari 於 2009-3-6 00:59 發表


超人平時比人封住個口講唔到野,唯有響LYK狂打!Ultraman文武雙全,勁呀!

I'm a superhero with righteous and lawful knowledge! Wakakakaakaka...........

TOP

原帖由 siumaibb 於 2009-3-5 22:09 發表
如果影果個唔係國泰員工?

Then, no "breaking staff regulation" issue for a regular bystander.
如果條片無上新聞?

Less people would know about this.
如果亞嬸無去投訴?

If the person taping was not a staff of any company, probably the lady would have nowhere to complain. The alternative could be, report to police?
你又會點睇?
究竟你覺影人果個係侵犯私隱定唔尊重客人?你自己諗諗

A regular bystander would have 侵犯私隱, a company staff would have both 侵犯私隱 and 唔尊重客人.

For example, if you killed a man but nobody sees you and nobody knows that, of course no news and TV reports this too. But it doesn't mean you didn't kill that man.

That means, even the lady didn't make a complaint, the video hasn't been spread over on the internet, the news haven't been reported it, the person who taped the video already committed 侵犯私隱 (plus 唔尊重客人 for a company staff on duty).

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-3-6 17:01 發表

I'm a superhero with righteous and lawful knowledge! Wakakakaakaka...........


幾時要再去出動打怪獸then?

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-3-6 16:56 發表

Did I tell you I am not a lawyer? But thanks to your compliment anyways.


法官大人, objection! "唔做律師既話真係浪費左佢天賦既才華" 並冇指明Ultraman 是律師與否既含意.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-3-6 02:01 發表

I'm a superhero with righteous and lawful knowledge! Wakakakaakaka...........


喂!律法超人 老夫 忽然靈光一閃;原來因为有人好似贵閣下咁熟悉法律,所以串謀做出

好戲,先而女主角發爛渣繼而航空公司员工錄眏全部過程,再放上網。女主角隨即向航空

公司投訢被侵犯私隐及不被尊重,因而提出要求賠償。如今一切都在佢哋計算之中而獲得

賠償,可憐我哋兩個儍佬卻抝到脸红脸绿,而毫冇着数!真係愈諗愈唔開心!唔知你有冇同

感呢?
人生易老天難老,
歲歲重陽。
今又重陽,
戰地黄花分外香。

TOP

TOP

如果我係佢老公

如果我係佢老公,即刻兜巴星佢,仲係佢面前講粗口鬧佢問佢癲夠未,乘機話如果佢再嘈就同佢離婚.

TOP

原帖由 老友四號 於 2009-3-6 03:35 發表


原來因为有人好似贵閣下咁熟悉法律,所以串謀做出

好戲...

Just this statement without solid proof, you can be charged for defamation and have to give compensation for any damage, not necessary limited to physical but also spiritual.

TOP

返回列表