個人覺得邏輯上要將 Bowtie 論分成兩部分：
我覺得焦點上， 應該主力追擊曾生 “經濟發展早已有定論”的言論上， 而將 “代表民意” 放於第二。 屆時特首先生的底牌會完全暴露fishbelly 發表於 2009-5-15 02:43 
Fishbelly, I was going to say something along the same lines, so thank you for pointing this out.
Bowtie was especially despicable because 2 things he said and implied:
1) Given China's economic growth in recent years, the Tiananmen massacre is justifiable and HK folks should forgive Beijing for their sins.
2) This view of his is representative of the mainstream society in Hong Kong, even though he was only "elected" by 600-something people (out of an 800-strong "election" committee).
And that brings to me the 2nd point:
49# Soli
好明顯我係同bowtie兜﹐ 但bowtie 都道左歉﹐再講都徙氣。soli 發表於 2009-5-14 16:18
If you go back to 9up Bowtie's so-called "apology", he only apologized for his mistake in #2, and how his comments in #2 made the legislators uncomfortable. However, as anyone can see, viewpoint #1 is just as serious a crime (if not a more serious one judging from a humanitarian point of view), and Bowtie has yet to apologize for this. So is it really 再講都徙氣 as Soli says in attempt to downplay the whole incident? I would think not.
9up PK Bowtie, go PK die la~ 
-Lik |
發表於 2009-5-14 18:53
| 
He said he represents all HK ppl ma..