bluemoon

原帖由 peter236 於 2009-2-24 14:13 發表
You guys should not do it too much.

how much is too much?

Manlau

Let's make it clear. Is the question "Is sex crucial in a relationship?" or "Can someone have love without sex?"? If it is the first one, then I would say "yes", sex is crucial in a normal love relationship----whether have or have not. If it is the second question, of course there are cases that someone can just love each other without sex----whether voluntary or involuntary. Right?

news

sex without love is like calling chicken..but maybe cleaner

MoiRhapsody

有肉唔食，罪大惡極。
我就唔曉神交........

rainbow-davie

原帖由 news 於 2009-2-25 13:01 發表
sex without love is like calling chicken..but maybe cleaner

No. there is huge difference.  
Call chicken,  you pay once, and go.  May be you will go back and at the same service again.  But, you just have to pay once. She won't ask you to buy LV, Gucci,,etc or compare you with her ex customers.  She will be happy if you pay her. She won't compain anything about you even you suck on bed.

A lover is different.  You know what I mean.

news

原帖由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-2-25 12:31 發表


No. there is huge difference.  
Call chicken,  you pay once, and go.  May be you will go back and at the same service again.  But, you just have to pay once. She won't ask you to buy LV, Gucci,,etc  ...

isnt buying lv, gucci for your sex partner like paying a sex trade worker in a way?

and how can u consider the person a lover when u r hving sex with this person without love though?

rainbow-davie

原帖由 news 於 2009-2-25 14:38 發表


isnt buying lv, gucci for your sex partner like paying a sex trade worker in a way?

and how can u consider the person a lover when u r hving sex with this person without love though?

yes.. buying LV GUCCI...et is like paying sex trade.. but more expensive.. and it is continuous. LOL

and you are right, i should call sex partner rather than lover.

Interesting.. what if a couple got together with love in the beginning, and then, after years, they are still together without love.  so, should we call them migrate from lover to sex partner? hahaahahaha.  and if they are tired of sex, then just called "artner".. and if they sleep separately..,then roommate?  

原帖由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-2-25 16:23 發表


yes.. buying LV GUCCI...et is like paying sex trade.. but more expensive.. and it is continuous. LOL

and you are right, i should call sex partner rather than lover.

Interesting.. what if a couple  ...

so true

邊少

原帖由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-2-25 16:23 發表


yes.. buying LV GUCCI...et is like paying sex trade.. but more expensive.. and it is continuous. LOL

and you are right, i should call sex partner rather than lover.

Interesting.. what if a couple  ...

what a sad truth for marriage and life

小叻

Love is NOT materialistic! If you LOVE each other.. u dun need LV GUCCI, etc.. you love the person..not their $$