返回列表 發帖
原帖由 mollinbaggio 於 2009-3-7 00:06 發表
如果我係佢老公,即刻兜巴星佢,仲係佢面前講粗口鬧佢問佢癲夠未,乘機話如果佢再嘈就同佢離婚.

If so, not only your wife has been taped as part I of the video; you could have been taped as part II. Kaka.....

TOP

yes-唔尊重客人
hm......侵犯私隱?!?

if you were filmed on a movie, tv show, news or etc when you are just walking on the street, can you sue them 侵犯私隱?

so many people are shooting pic on the street with ton of people at the background, can you sue the photographer 侵犯私隱?

TOP

原帖由 tofu 於 2009-3-7 00:50 發表
yes-唔尊重客人
hm......侵犯私隱?!?

if you were filmed on a movie, tv show, news or etc when you are just walking on the street, can you sue them 侵犯私隱?

so many people are shooting pic on the str ...

It's like airforce flying on your private premises, which is allowed without asking for your permission of any kind. Some persons/professions have special authority to carry their duty in the public needless to acquire individual's consent.  
However, none of the persons involved in the CX case has that kind of authority.

TOP

Tofu, the woman got a case there because the film was shot by a Cathay employee, she can sue Cathay for negligent.

Anyone other than the empolyees of Cathay shot the video should have been okay.   I beg the Cathay  management should have consulted their corporate lawyer and make the decision. A liitle price just to close the case legally, not that Cathay won't win the case.  

If this case goes to court.  In Hong Kong, 80% Cathay will win the case. In  In Canada, 20% Cathay will win the case (if she has not go to the extreme to theaten the RCMP with a stapler).   In States, there will be no case because she should have been throw into dentention immediately.

TOP

原帖由 katamari 於 2009-3-5 14:49 發表
阿嬸做過咩我 no comment, 但係點解咁多人覺得唔應該向阿嬸道歉賠償? 個問題係有員工犯錯而影響一個客人聲譽, 道歉同賠償係好正常喎. 如果影野條友冇處分我怕下次比人影到響飛機上頭髮蓬鬆然後上youtubeo個個係你地 ...


我覺得員工o係發生d 咁既野之下拎手機出黎影野留record 第時萬一有咩事既時候做證,無咩唔妥,即係好似你同人架車炒埋一碟你落車影相留record 差唔多。宜家太多人一味靠屈同靠賴.......

個員工冇迫個客咁做,亦都唔係個員工對個客有咩不敬﹖我明白宜家生意難做,留得一個客得一個客,但係身為係上級既都應該多方面睇下,有時唔一定個客岩晒!盞助長左某d人既氣焰

TOP

我終於好有耐性咁睇完個clips
都無咩呀.. 咁係人旁惶自責既時候都會失控.  

最抵死係佢罵佢老公: 你入一個人就俾兩個人入, 你入去先呀麻.邊有咁蠢...

好typical 香港人諗法.

TOP

問題係, 如果個員工係當席時拍, 而佢拍黎係俾公司做record, 就無問題, 但如果係為自己一時高興, 就有違操守.  咁真係會影響公司形象.

如果佢落左班影既, 就無問題.

第二個問題係... 其實都唔關cathay 事,  就係套片既distribution 問題. 佢未徵求對方同意而拍及發放, 係可能引發私隱問題 ---- 辜問論個女人做過咩, 你 like or dislike her action.

TOP

原帖由 MyOMy 於 2009-3-7 02:21 發表
Tofu, the woman got a case there because the film was shot by a Cathay employee, she can sue Cathay for negligent.

Anyone other than the empolyees of Cathay shot the video should have been okay.   I  ...


no. in Canada, 佢會死. 會有四五人個皇家騎警黎電死佢, 之後詁佢雙手拍檯咁有力,係weapon

TOP

原帖由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-3-7 10:35 發表


no. in Canada, 佢會死. 會有四五人個皇家騎警黎電死佢, 之後詁佢雙手拍檯咁有力,係weapon

TRUE!

TOP

原帖由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-3-7 10:35 發表


之後詁佢雙手拍檯咁有力,係weapon

我好惹火。。。

TOP

返回列表