(No intention to start any fire at all.)
My opinion:
1. Generally speaking, to believe in something without solid (scientific) proof usually would be called 迷信. For example, to wear some kind of crystal can bring you good luck. But not to believe in something without solid (scientific) proof not usually called 迷信, the most people would called stubborn.
2. Why to believe there is a God is more logical? And even there is a God, why the Christianity God is more logical?
(No intention to start any fire at all.)
2. Why to believe there is a God is more logical? And even there is a God, why the Christianity God is more logical?Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-2 00:27
It is simple. If there is no god, then we need to believe everthing happened by chances (no plan, no design, no strucutre and no time line). However, the universe seems to be too complex for everything just happend by chance.
why do we have to have 2 hands, 2 legs, 2 eyes and 2 ears? why they are distributed so geometrically? why do other animals also have the same similar characters? it is just one example. there are too many examples we can list.
I didn't say Christianity God is more logical. Maybe we can talk about other religions as well.
Why people only have 2 hands and 2 legs... but not 3 eyes and 4 hands....? Who knows if 3 eyes and 4 hands could be better? All because of we see human is like what we see now, but we can't conclude that this must because of God made us, or there must be a God. For example, if someone found a $20 bill in a forest, he/she might think there must be someone who has passed by the forest and dropped the money on the ground. However, the fact might be the money bill was originally left on a busy city street and then wind blew it to the forest. That's called logic-- someone dropped the money is not the only possible answer.
I really have no idea why there were dinosaurs up to nowadays human and all living form, but that doesn't prove that God is the only possibility.
發表於 2009-12-1 21:54
| 
