Ultraman

My very little understand according to the video clip, there was a price difference for the same item in which was a $500.00 and a $52X.00 in the MK branch and the branch that manager works with. Ms Chiu was unhappy that she bought the item in the more expensive price, yet manager Wong said that the lower price was actually wrongly marked by mistake by the other branch but not his branch, and so he couldn't have any authority to do anything for her.

Am I right?

chunsh

Wah ..  even she is very bitchy ...  but now .. all her own pictures ... around the world already?  even her bf ?  then it is a bit too much wor ..
Catpiano 發表於 2009-9-22 21:10

if u said this 2 days ago, I totally disagree with u, since its that girl to do some "web harassment" to that manager. That could lead to the fire of that manager and still, there is no proof of what she said about the manager. She wants judgement from the web? now she got it, BUT there are too many pics and information about her have been revealled in these 2 days, and still going on. But I think that is enough ALREADY for her

Littleprince

我比較喜歡這個人的看法﹕

網上欺凌﹐自食其果

一語中的﹐好野~~~

http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!dL ... --/article?mid=1895

互聯網近日熱播一段寸爆港女與連鎖店店長為貨價激烈爭拗的片段，「辣著」網友，短短二十小時，點擊率高近四萬次，單在討論區已有超過三千條留言，相關標題討論多達三十個，大部分網民都不值港女「得理不饒人」的所為，為店長呼冤。網民更透過「人肉搜尋器」為該港女大起底，張貼她的照片，發動聲討。(太陽報)

事件中的女大學生可能未去過七十一買野,每間七十一的標價都不同,因為經濟學都有"空間距離價值",極端例子,有人在沙漠中,一瓶水缺水時,一百元美金一瓶水也有人買.網友五星下的三星:"你可以唔買".要別人一定用你定的價錢賣俾你,同打劫冇分別.

第二, 被拍的黃店長有權,而且有責任提醒其他分店同事標錯價,而那女子仍可以按舊價(錯誤的標價)在旺角買那個洗臉是人情,但卻不可以強迫元朗店必定要用較低標價賣出貨品.

第三,店舖是私人地方, 負責人是有權干涉任何人入內拍攝,那女子強行拍攝就犯了法, 侵犯他人私隱,被拍的人覺得不安,是犯了遊蕩罪.

第四, 別人的姓名電話,樣貌,工作地點都是私隱,你放上網其實係網上欺凌.

事後在網誌道歉,但數小時後,又用網誌"公開事實",仍然是店長錯,是原則的問題,她只是堅持原因, "而且之前有朋友忠告過那連鎖店不太老實",要再踏對方一腳.

playingtoy

base on the video. i believe this is what actually have happened.

myversa

81# Ultraman

Actually I think she was angry because when she phoned the other branch about the availability and price, the manager in the video phoned that branch at the same time to inform them that their price was wrongly marked.

wow

Littleprince

myversa:

成件事係她自己講﹐她想了幾天﹐梗係諗到點樣講先講到自己著﹐別人唔著﹐所以她的一面之詞完全不可信 ﹐事實係點除非兩人出面對質先會知真相﹐或者有第三者講返出黎﹐但無論上文下理係怎樣﹐她這樣兜口兜面影人已經係唔岩﹐呢樣野就人人可見﹐加上她在旁邊所說的話﹐以為道理完全在自己那邊﹐完全唔尊重人﹐我聽到都嬲到很想打她﹐所以看完後都罵了她八婆了。。。如果她真的累了人家丟了工作﹐更罪大惡極添。。。

Littleprince

件事可以有好多種處理方法﹐例如打給他上司投訴﹐去消委會﹐告訴一周刊﹐乜都好﹐她卻採取了最不智﹐最暴露了她的黑心卻以為自己很高明的一種方法

Catpiano

81# Ultraman

Actually I think she was angry because when she phoned the other branch about the availability and price, the manager in the video phoned that branch at the same time to inform them th ...
myversa 發表於 2009-9-22 23:30

That is so normal wor ..  always .. always .. the HIGHER price is the correct/updated price la...   and I think the STOP manager did agree to give her the same price??  and she got 30% off anyway wor ..  so even 25 dollar more, but 30% off ..

It happened here all the time la.. u see 2 price ..  then the shop always say the lower price is wrong .. and change it ...

daimo

I'm more curious if you were Ms. Chiu's boy friend ....

what will you do?