返回列表 發帖

China: investing in green technology

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-1-11 03:19 編輯

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/opinion/10friedman.html

Who’s Sleeping Now?
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Hong Kong

C. H. Tung, the first Chinese-appointed chief executive of Hong Kong after the handover in 1997, offered me a three-sentence summary the other day of China’s modern economic history: “China was asleep during the Industrial Revolution. She was just waking during the Information Technology Revolution. She intends to participate fully in the Green Revolution.”

I’ll say. Being in China right now I am more convinced than ever that when historians look back at the end of the first decade of the 21st century, they will say that the most important thing to happen was not the Great Recession, but China’s Green Leap Forward. The Beijing leadership clearly understands that the E.T. — Energy Technology — revolution is both a necessity and an opportunity, and they do not intend to miss it.

We, by contrast, intend to fix Afghanistan. Have a nice day.

O.K., that was a cheap shot. But here’s one that isn’t: Andy Grove, co-founder of Intel, liked to say that companies come to “strategic inflection points,” where the fundamentals of a business change and they either make the hard decision to invest in a down cycle and take a more promising trajectory or do nothing and wither. The same is true for countries.

The U.S. is at just such a strategic inflection point. We are either going to put in place a price on carbon and the right regulatory incentives to ensure that America is China’s main competitor/partner in the E.T. revolution, or we are going to gradually cede this industry to Beijing and the good jobs and energy security that would go with it.

Is President Obama going to finish health care and then put aside the pending energy legislation — and carbon pricing — that Congress has already passed in order to get through the midterms without Republicans screaming “new taxes?” Or is he going to seize this moment before the midterms — possibly his last window to put together a majority in the Senate, including some Republicans, for a price on carbon — and put in place a real U.S. engine for clean energy innovation and energy security?

I’ve been stunned to learn about the sheer volume of wind, solar, mass transit, nuclear and more efficient coal-burning projects that have sprouted in China in just the last year.

Here’s e-mail from Bill Gross, who runs eSolar, a promising California solar-thermal start-up: On Saturday, in Beijing, said Gross, he announced “the biggest solar-thermal deal ever. It’s a 2 gigawatt, $5 billion deal to build plants in China using our California-based technology. China is being even more aggressive than the U.S. We applied for a [U.S. Department of Energy] loan for a 92 megawatt project in New Mexico, and in less time than it took them to do stage 1 of the application review, China signs, approves, and is ready to begin construction this year on a 20 times bigger project!”

Yes, climate change is a concern for Beijing, but more immediately China’s leaders know that their country is in the midst of the biggest migration of people from the countryside to urban centers in the history of mankind. This is creating a surge in energy demand, which China is determined to meet with cleaner, homegrown sources so that its future economy will be less vulnerable to supply shocks and so it doesn’t pollute itself to death.

In the last year alone, so many new solar panel makers emerged in China that the price of solar power has fallen from roughly 59 cents a kilowatt hour to 16 cents, according to The Times’s bureau chief here, Keith Bradsher. Meanwhile, China last week tested the fastest bullet train in the world — 217 miles per hour — from Wuhan to Guangzhou. As Bradsher noted, China “has nearly finished the construction of a high-speed rail route from Beijing to Shanghai at a cost of $23.5 billion. Trains will cover the 700-mile route in just five hours, compared with 12 hours today. By comparison, Amtrak trains require at least 18 hours to travel a similar distance from New York to Chicago.”

China is also engaged in the world’s most rapid expansion of nuclear power. It is expected to build some 50 new nuclear reactors by 2020; the rest of the world combined might build 15.

“By the end of this decade, China will be dominating global production of the whole range of power equipment,” said Andrew Brandler, the C.E.O. of the CLP Group, Hong Kong’s largest power utility.

In the process, China is going to make clean power technologies cheaper for itself and everyone else. But even Chinese experts will tell you that it will all happen faster and more effectively if China and America work together — with the U.S. specializing in energy research and innovation, at which China is still weak, as well as in venture investing and servicing of new clean technologies, and with China specializing in mass production.

This is a strategic inflection point. It is clear that if we, America, care about our energy security, economic strength and environmental quality we need to put in place a long-term carbon price that stimulates and rewards clean power innovation. We can’t afford to be asleep with an invigorated China wide awake.

傻仔
你會唔會倒你老細嘅米?
人地同你買野 你會唔會話佢白癡丫

TOP

Gee... China's Green Leap Forward... could they have chosen a worse name?! (Just think back to how superbly successful the Great Leap Forward was 50 years ago...

It is true that China is doing a ton of green technology work (more for the country's own good than anything else, although I don't have a problem with that at all). But don't forget the tyrannical actions and requests that the Chinese government has taken during the Copenhagen talks, which pretty much resulted in a completely useless agreement on how the World should work together to slow climate change.

-Lik

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-1-11 15:01 編輯
Gee... China's Green Leap Forward... could they have chosen a worse name?! (Just think back to how superbly successful the Great Leap Forward was 50 years ago...

It is true that China is doing a t ...
Lik 發表於 2010-1-11 12:51

You stupid moron, it is the US that took tyrannical actions during Copenhagen. This shows the US was not sincere and wanted to shift the blame to other countries.
Lik, why are you so naive to fall such a US lie? The US wanted to set up a fund, with borrowed money, to help certain developing countries to control pollution, provided that the US can monitor China's actions. But this is ridiculous anyway, since these are two separate issues, as China does not need the money. Would the US allow Chinese inspectors to monitor the US's enforcement of pollution control?
Meanwhile, the politicians from the maple leaf country were laughed at by the environmentalists.

TOP

Welcome ....  MORON.

TOP

LOL~

I think someone has posted this before, but read a little and try to educate yourself before spewing any nonsense from your mouth la:

How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the room


-Lik

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-1-11 15:05 編輯
LOL~

I think someone has posted this before, but read a little and try to educate yourself before spewing any nonsense from your mouth la:

How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in t ...
Lik 發表於 2010-1-11 15:01

LOL, when you quote from the British imperialists, you know it is going to be biased against China.
China will soon be leading, if not already, in green technology. The western countries can only spew crap and shift the blame to developing countries.
Lik, how many LED light bulbs have you bought recently.

TOP

Welcome ....  MORON.
Catpiano 發表於 2010-1-11 14:58


I only read until "moron" in his post and stopped.

TOP

I only read until "moron" in his post and stopped.


myversa 發表於 2010-1-11 16:27


Why Why Why??

I dont even need to read till "MORON" since you know he will say "MORON" anyway ..  lol

TOP

I actually did not read the articles.  haha.  who cares about China's technologies when it still got long way to go with standards of people living in China.

Example one: keep on calling people moron.

TOP

返回列表