台搶攻釣島 日本政府, 北京, 台北, 野柳

tiffiant

釣魚島主權爭議愈演愈烈，向日抗議的聲音由官方擴至民間，海峽兩岸保釣行動升級。在大陸漁船船長詹其雄仍然遭日本政府扣查、北京叫停正常中日外交活動之際，台灣保釣船昨凌晨亦往釣島海域宣示主權，遭日本海上保安廳空群出動巡邏船及直升機，進行海空包圍攔截，輪番開強力探射燈和廣播警告，台灣的海巡署護航艦艇用射燈反照還擊，雙方在海上對峙五個多小時，保釣船最後因為無法突圍，被迫折返。目前正部署下一波抗議行動。

載有中華保釣協會執行長黃錫麟等兩名台灣保釣人士的漁船「感恩99號」，前天下午從台北縣野柳漁港出發，台灣的行政院轄下的海巡署動員「和星艦」等六艦一船五艇共十二船艦，尾隨執行護航任務。但此次保釣行動卻連生波折，原訂隨船出發的多名港澳人士，最終因台灣當局阻撓而未能隨行。

保釣船前天深夜接近釣魚島海域，即遭兩艘日本海上保安廳巡邏船跟蹤監視。昨凌晨一時四十七分，保釣船駛至釣島西南三十九公里處，進入日本自稱的專屬經濟區水域，日方以八艘巡邏船組成防線，用船身推擠，阻擋保釣船前行，日方連同外圍的船艇共有約十一艘，並出動直升機在空中監視。台方以六艘巡防艦在前、五艘巡防艇殿後，圍繞保釣船和日方對峙，氣氛緊張。

tiffiant

台艦隊與日海上對峙五小時
對峙期間，日方巡邏船再用探射燈照向保釣船干擾航行，並以擴音器用中文廣播：「釣魚島是我們的海域，請你們快點離開」，還藉不斷排廢氣驅趕保釣船。台灣海巡署船艦亦用相同招數反擊，用射燈反照日方，並以廣播宣示主權，雙方展開長達五個多小時的對峙。早上近七時，台灣海巡署船隻被日本保安廳艦艇隔開，保釣船因無法突圍決定返航。日本海上保安廳指出，保釣船中途時開時停，日艇一度跟隨折返的保釣船，直至約九時半駛離日方聲稱的專屬經濟區。

台日政府就對峙風波互提抗議，台灣的外交部昨提出嚴正抗議，重申釣魚島為台灣固有領土，台方任何船艦在釣島海域活動，屬主權管轄範圍，要求日方勿作干擾。日本內閣官房長官仙谷由人同日向台方提出抗議。共同社報道，台灣的外交部前天召見日本駐台代表今井正，今井正對台方讓保釣船出海提出抗議，表示極度遺憾。

保釣成員轟馬英九軟弱無能
保釣船昨晚平安返抵台北縣野柳漁港，船身未受損，黃錫麟指出，海巡署船隻被日本艦艇隔開，惟有結束行動，他批評馬英九護漁無力、軟弱無能，協會計劃籌集一千萬新台幣購置保釣船，會不時到釣島宣示主權，並監督政府派船保護。海巡署回應，派出十二艘船為保釣船護航，並與日方船隻對峙，是歷來保釣任務出動最多艦艇的一次，總統府則重申，維護釣魚島主權是政府堅持的一貫立場，從未改變

tiffiant

WE MUST protect our lands, chinese people

Lik

I fully agree that the Diaoyu Islands should have belonged to China, but as much as I hate to admit, by international laws and standards, the effective "ownership rights" have long been lost to Japan now. And this is entirely due to the incompetency and lack of action on both PRC and ROC.

Since the 50's (might even have been a bit earlier), Japan has continually exercised their "ownership rights" by occupying the Diaoyu Islands, building structures on it, and petrolling the waters close by with their "defence" ships, while China has only occasionally voiced the ownership of the islands in foreign affair speeches while taking zero official government action. By international standards, a continual lack of presence, occupation, and petrolling the area on China's part effectively means they have forfeited their ownership claims on the piece of land. On the other hand, Japan has continually been doing this for 50+ years. Taken to the international courts, China would most definitely lose the ownership claims to Japan.

A simple analogy is, consider what happens when I move into an empty house that you originally owned. I live there for 50 years and all you do is tell people the house is yours, not mine while taking zero real action to kick me out. In 50 year's time, any reasonable law court would have concluded that your lack of action is simply an admission on your part that you have given up ownership of the house, and that the place now belongs to me.

This is what is happening now with the Diaoyu Islands. It has been forever lost to Japan because of the lack of action from China and its government.

-Lik

rockypath

回復 6# Lik

I guess what you want to say the most is -- the ownership of Hong Kong shall have been lost to UK forever long long time ago.

rainbow-davie

I think either China decalers they will have military practise there.
or
Announce Nuclear testing on this island
or
Just Fxxk it, nuclear bomb it.  No one get it.  Thanks God.

Lik

回復  Lik

I guess what you want to say the most is -- the ownership of Hong Kong shall have been lost to UK forever long long time ago.rockypath 發表於 2010-9-16 10:01

擦鞋狗，

你識唔識字㗎？當年英國係同中國「租借」香港 99年，就算租借條款點樣唔公平都好，租借嘅契約響97年完咗嘅時候，因為中英雙方都無續約，所以自然要還返香港俾中國啦？

-力

peter236

擦鞋狗，

你識唔識字㗎？當年英國係同中國「租借」香港 99年，就算租借條款點樣唔公平都好，租借嘅契約響 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-9-16 11:31

Mr Lik,
The Taiwanese didn't allow your idol long hair and a few others to board the ship. What are you going to say about this? Do you dare to bash the Taiwanese?

If it was HK government that was preventing long hair from boarding the ship, you would have bashed the HK government. Now you coward, dare not bash the ROC Taiwan government that failed to exercise control over Diaoyu Islands for decades.

Your idol long hair was a coward, since he dared not board the ship, after Taiwan officials threatened to disallow his right of entering Taiwan in the future.