國家古蹟變餐館 天壇故宮「處處炊煙」 北京, 上海, 北海

Lik

http://www1.hk.apple.nextmedia.c ... amp;art_id=15266790

國家古蹟變餐館
天壇故宮「處處炊煙」

北京故宮建福宮改私人高級會所引發的風波越鬧越大。內地媒體陸續曝光，包括北京故宮的太廟、北海公園漪瀾堂、天壇公園旻園、頤和園聽鸝館，以及上海的勒馬別墅等眾多國家級文物單位，均遭毒手，慘變搖錢樹。

《北京晨報》記者前日在故宮太廟正殿看到，殿內正在拍電影，宮方坦承太廟常承辦此類收費活動，每日收費 80萬（人民幣．下同）至 100萬元不等，其他項目每項 10萬元，在太殿平台等地辦活動，每場則收 20萬元。該報同時指，北海公園著名的漪瀾堂、道寧齋被北海仿膳飯莊佔用，經營已經 80多年，每晚那裏人流熙攘。而經營仿膳飯莊的北京全聚德每年要向公園交房租，但租金不詳。


位於北海公園內的仿膳飯莊，是很多遊客必到的景點。


頤和園聽鸝館飯莊的招牌上，掛着清乾隆御筆「金支秀華」的牌匾。


天壇旻園餐廳佔用天壇內仿古建築。

至於天壇公園內的旻園餐館，佔據仿古建築，每日菜餚飄香，客如雲來；頤和園十三名勝之一的聽鸝館，也被掛着「聽鸝館飯莊」招牌的企業佔着，門前還有乾隆皇帝御書匾額「金支秀華」。


上海馬勒別墅變酒店

此外，始建於上世紀初、有歐洲古堡風格的上海馬勒別墅，早被改成酒店，豪華行政套房每晚 9,800元；該別墅因早年被中紀委當成調查上海前市委書記陳良宇為首的社保資金案大本營，備受關注。

北京古建築研究所所長韓揚認為，國家文物保護單位合理開發可以，原則是不能對建築造成傷害或影響開放環境，但上述名勝的利用顯然有違原則。他指，文物單位創收應有監管，並應向社會公開；任何以古文物牟利只益部門和小團體的做法都應禁止。

「現在，從故宮到天壇，從北海到頤和園，這些皇家園林內幾乎『處處炊煙』……」北京《新京報》昨發表「文物古建『經商」亂象」，批評使用古建築的審批程序混亂，認為有關部門是時候該管管了。

《北京晨報》/《新京報》

被爆變搖錢樹的國家級古蹟

•北京故宮建福宮改建成高級私人會所，每位入會費 100萬元
•北海仿膳飯莊佔用園內倚晴樓，由全聚德經營
•北京太廟正殿被指出租拍電影，日租 50萬元
•北京天壇旻園餐廳佔用天壇內仿古建築，每位收費 150元
•北京頤和園聽鸝館出租做飯莊，不設點菜每桌收 5,000元
•南京美齡宮淪高級婚宴場，最低消費 200元
•上海馬勒別墅被改做酒店，豪華行政房每晚房租 9,800元

Lik

乜野叫做藐視文化歷史？呢啲咪叫做藐視文化歷史囉。
點樣先算係有辱國體？咁樣咪叫做有辱國體囉！

-力

peter236

This is very good strategy. The revenue generated can be used to maintain the historic palace. The younger generation can then have the chance to respect and learn about the Chinese culture.

rockypath

I personally don’t think it is a serious problem that can be called – “藐視文化歷史有辱國體”.

In fact, I would support the historic heritages should be 有嚴格監管地進行合理地商業開發 to extend their life. That is why we see some historic buildings in western countries become famous hotels or restaurants.

In addition, I had been to most of these restaurants being mentioned in the article such as 頤和園聽鸝館飯莊, 北海仿膳飯莊和李蓮英故居 (I forgot the name of the restaurant). Honestly speaking, not many people would bother to take a look on those buildings if they were not converted to restaurants and they would probably become 危房 since the government won’t spend as much money to upkeep them compare to other more important historic sites and buildings.

After being converted to commercial use, they were kept in pretty good shapes. What should be done now is that the government should establish strict regulations to prohibit any physical damage to the buildings. Other than that, I think it is a good idea and working fine.

lo_pak

As long as there is a multiple-win relationship and the places are keeping neat, no bother...

rockypath

As long as there is a multiple-win relationship and the places are keeping neat, no bother...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-5-19 00:54

Lik does not have the ability to make objective judgement. He can be easily blinded and enjoy fooling himself.