Since 2008, auto thefts in Vancouver have dropped in half (due largely to engine immobilizers), robberies are down by a third and break-and-enters are down a quarter. In contrast, during that same period, bike thefts increased 50 per cent, from 1,179 in 2008 to 1,821 in 2012.
“We’ve been able to decrease other property crimes but [bike theft] is one we’ve had a real challenge with,” said Montague.
Indeed, in 2010, Vancouver had more bikes stolen than cars, a trend that has continued every year since.
The most obvious explanation for the increase in bike thefts is that more people are biking as the number of dedicated bike lanes in the city increases.
A report that went to Vancouver city council last June estimated, based on TransLink trip diary data, that the number of trips by bike in the city increased more than 40 per cent between 2008 and 2011.
Yet bikes also seem particularly vulnerable to theft.
That same TransLink trip diary data suggests there are roughly 20 times more cars on the road in Vancouver than bikes, which means that, if you bike to work instead of drive, the chances your ride will get stolen are about 30 times higher.
“I have lots of friends who cycle commute and we’ve all generally established that, on average, you would get a bike stolen once every two years if you’re a regular cycle commuter,” said Li.
Li has had a bike stolen three times: In Richmond in 2004, outside MEC in 2006 and then outside the library in 2012.
Montague said one of the things that makes bikes so vulnerable is very few people record their bicycle’s serial number, which is usually located beneath the crankshaft. That means, once stolen, bikes become almost impossible to trace — and extremely easy to sell.
If a bike theft victim is able to provide a serial number, police enter it on the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) system, which any police force in the country can search if they recover a suspected stolen bike. People buying used bikes can also search serial numbers on CPIC’s public website at cpic-cipc.ca to see if it’s stolen.
Unfortunately, said Montague, “I would say the majority of people wouldn’t have a clue what their serial number is.”
That means police are often unable to prove bikes are stolen even when they strongly suspect that they are.
“We’ll go into someone’s apartment on a search warrant looking for stolen property or drugs and we’ll often find a warehouse for bicycles,” he said. “And out of 10 or 20 or 30 bicycles ... only one or two have been reported stolen with the serial number.”
The other factor driving bike thefts, said Montague, is how expensive some bikes have become.
“We’re not riding around on the old $50 Norcos that I used to ride when I was a kid,” he said. “People are commuting on bikes that are worth $2,000, $3,000, $4,000 sometimes.”
•
On July 27, 2012, more than a month after her bike was stolen at the library, Li had a going-away barbecue at Kitsilano Beach in preparation for her departure to Malawi to volunteer on a water sanitation project.
As the party got underway, a new friend of hers, Eric Moutal, rode up to the beach in a mahogany Kona Dew Drop just like the one Li used to have.
“I looked at it and said: ‘Wait a minute, that looks like my bike,” Li recalls.
At first, Li just assumed it was a different bike of the same type. After all, the wheels and bike seat weren’t quite the same as hers.
But then she noticed some things that were the same, like a specific spot along the top of her frame where she had scratched her bike and tried to cover it up with nail polish.
Moutal and Li flipped the bike over and she checked the serial number: It was her bike, just with some of the components switched out.
“At that point, we didn’t know what to do,” said Moutal. “Do I give her back the bike?”
Li had already bought another bike by then and was leaving the country in a few weeks anyways. Keep it, she told Eric.
“I was glad to see my bike again intact, that was cool,” said Li. “We now call this our bike, our stolen bike. It’s brought us together.” |