[香港新聞] 兩警轟三槍擊斃90後躁爸 photo, 保安, 青年, 上大

tiffiant

兩警轟三槍擊斃90後躁爸
小風波觸發大悲劇，兩警連開三槍，擊斃九十後躁爸爸。二十一歲火爆青年，被友人妻踢爆風流情史及欠債，同齡妻子怒帶八個月大兒子離家出走，往藍田投靠死黨。青年氣極，昨凌晨偕友踩上大廈，逐家逐戶拍閘踢門尋妻，驚動保安員下逐客令及報警。他到電梯大堂後仍肆意搗亂，更在保安崗位奪鎅刀，架保安員頸上挾持，見妻在女警陪同下現身，即持鎅刀撲向兩人。兩警拔槍警告無效，連開三槍，轟斃青年，妻子目擊哭成淚人。據了解，死者前額及頸部共中兩槍。


死者何世通一家的幸福合照。（互聯網圖片）





何世通中槍倒斃（紅圈示）電梯大堂，大批警員在場調查。





死者何世通





死者妻子神情悲傷。





曾被死者用鎅刀挾持的保安員。





死者用以拍打保安崗位的膠牌跌在地上。





尋妻青年被擊斃模擬圖
青年尋妻不果，大鬧電梯大堂，以告示膠牌拍打保安崗位。





青年在保安崗位奪去鎅刀挾持保安員，一手箍頸一手持鎅刀架頸，與警對峙。






青年持鎅刀撲向妻子及女警，兩人避開青年時跌倒，兩警拔槍警告無效，連開三槍擊斃他。

tiffiant

被轟斃男子何世通，疑一直欺騙妻子，稱她是自己的初戀情人，惟好友妻子前日卻踢爆他以往「大把女朋友」，最近又欠友人逾千元未還。何妻得悉後不滿，前晚與夫爭執，氣憤下帶同兒子離家。

翻查妻紀念冊找藏身地
何翻查妻子中學紀念冊，找出她姓陳女死黨居於康雅苑杏雅閣。凌晨約三時，何駕車載同好友及另一男友人抵達上址，惟不知確實單位，上樓後隨即在二十二樓等多個樓層逐家逐戶拍閘踢門和叫罵，驚動保安員到場及報警。

何被帶往地下大堂後怒氣未消，仍情緒激動和破口大罵，先執起置在地上「小心地滑」告示膠牌，不斷拍打保安崗位洩憤致粉碎，更奪去一柄長約五吋鎅刀，以左手緊箍其中一名四十八歲保安員，右手則以伸出約兩吋的鎅刀刀鋒架其頸項。

警員接報到場調查，見保安員被人持刀挾持，立即增援。大批持盾牌警員趕至，一名女警與同袍上樓聯絡何妻。何的好友以WhatsApp通知何妻：「你老公喺樓下搞大咗件事！」

大堂搗亂打碎膠牌洩憤
雙方對峙數分鐘後，妻子由女警陪同落樓。何情緒變得更激動，立即放開保安員，持刀撲向妻子和女警。女警拉着何妻退後約五米，卻雙雙仆跌。何續持刀衝向兩人，在場警署警長羅健豪和警員莊澤瑋遂拔槍警告。惟有人不理會警告，羅及莊分別開一槍及兩槍，槍聲過後何倒伏地上，前額和頸共中兩槍浴血。

大批機動部隊、東九龍重案組和鑑證科等逾百人趕至，封鎖現場及在客貨車搜證，探員翻看大廈內閉路電視了解案發經過。何的好友一臉茫然，因其妻子踢爆何的情史導致悲劇不斷自責。

東九龍總區刑事部高級警司余嘉麒稱，警方對警員開槍使用武力有嚴格規範，至於死者的中槍部位，則要由法醫判斷，案件會召開死因聆訊。據悉，警方初步相信死者有兩處槍傷，但因他滿身鮮血，故仍未能確定中槍數目，預料最快明天驗屍後有結果。

chunsh

香港警察真關係慘，點做都俾人鬧。有無人可憐個兩位差人自己都有心理陰影....
if the news is true, firing at the suspect is the only way to stop any other getting hurt. It is sad, but it is true.

4boybun

If the news is true,  shooting at 前額和頸 ......好似是有點問題。

4boybun

人生無常，一煞那，世界已經唔同哂。

chunsh

If the news is true,  shooting at 前額和頸 ......好似是有點問題。
4boybun 發表於 2014-5-7 02:05

Remember, and if the news are true, the suspect is a moving target, the cops have like a second or 1.5 second to think whether they should fire and less than a second to aim. I dont understand why people keep saying things like "police should not aim for the head" I am like....oh come on....sounds like the cops are PURPOSELY aim for the head. A well-trained US Marine Sniper wouldn't able to aim for the object with size of a head within a second or at most two WITHOUT minutes of zooming and 精良瞄準裝備.

A guess would be, they aim for the suspect, no doubt, but not purposely aim for the head. Think of it this way, those two cops have no beef with the suspect, why would you think they would aim for the head of the suspect

Of course, the ultimate truth is only known by the people onsite and may be in CCTV

chobit

Since the guy was already emotionally unstable, and I think it was a mis-judgement to bring her wife down.
So IMHO, I think rather or not the HK Police should be responsible would depends on if they have done anything to de-escalate the situation or actually did things that provoke ...

fibbi

I think the police should aim at the leg instead? So he can't move?
Maybe the police think the wife can calm him down?

B2L2

According to another newspaper, the polices who fired were only 3m away from the man.  Such a small distance and with a 鎅刀 only, it will have a case.

chunsh

I think the police should aim at the leg instead? So he can't move?
Maybe the police think the wife ...
fibbi 發表於 2014-5-8 10:23

sigh....as I mentioned in the first 2 sentences in my reply....
emergency situation
less than second or two to make a decision to fire to not
less than a second to aim....

Even a well train US marine sniper can aim accurately. so I dont understand why some people keep saying the cops aim for the head IN PURPOSE

In North America, this news wouldn't be such a big news since:
1) suspect keeping hostage with weapon (even if it is a cutter)
2) police GAVE warning
3) suspect ignore warning, didnt put down his weapon and did something stupid
Police shot fire, case closed

if hk people need a cop that really can shot fire with absolute calm manner and accuracy emergency. Only he can help: